with gradual rises, it’s part of one of those sites, what it’s called Murray Murray is pretty much the same logic but aesthetically it has nothing to do with it, it’s the same logic adapted to another topographical and geological configuration but it’s the same logic to have a dozen 13 terraces that go from a cool temperature a temperature more, how to say Hatier says by the confinement of the small valley and you have a morning exposure and a late exposure perfectly aligned which allows you to have exposure to the air of at the end of the afternoon, different altitudes, all watered by rivers, a case it’s super pretty, it’s great, so that’s why I’m explaining to you to make 12 varieties of Chinese and today we accuse them and we had at least a dozen varieties of almonds and today we produced more so to answer Thomas that’s the nourishing speed of genetic and biocultural destruction that is happening today Nevertheless, I also believe that since the pandemic, there has been an effect that, even if it dissolves, it is diluted a little in the usual recovery, there is an awareness that was taken during the pandemic, when we had the crisis, the communities realized the capacity for self-sufficiency, the strength of view, the good life, the good life that we had, and even we almost came to wish for the continuity of the allowed for a long time because we felt that we were living quite special moments, you see, all the crops had remained in the community and they were used to selling them and so we sell them in they bought industrial food and as a result, he ate less well, you see, the fact of the pandemic, our inmates, made that the whole gang of livestock and agricultural production stayed here at the There was no lack of work because we had to plant and food was not lacking and that’s what I’m taking the system I’m talking about at the bottom, it’s strictly functional from the production ecosystem, obviously the seed is at the center of all this, that’s why, even if we have the production force, my job as a researcher is to put the seed back into this ecosystem. dynamic there that is still relevant and that’s how I think we have a chance to get out of the crises that that make us succumb every year, we don’t get out of crises because the people of the capital don’t understand this production capacity of the communities, they are in a unidirectional logic and so they don’t understand the food production potential that we have, I don’t know if that’s a bit of an answer to your questioning here, after the other question, it’s more speculative, but it’s not the reversed gaze that on the West in its drift to the fields in its drift with the invention of the word variety even in Europe which is documented by industrialists 100 or 150 years ago after the guy I think you see so I think that time would have been thought that what you are talking to me about in a kind of conflict between the West and the traditional world And I would still like to tell you that I think that the world, this conflict is not based on the traditional man or the traditional woman, it is in Western science itself, there is no conflict, unless you know that you feel that the exercise is to make a choice between one and the other, as we said earlier in the reflection on immigration, if you come out of this schema, the problem, if there is one, if we had to determine a problem in the West, I think it’s to have lost sight of the connection to the earth, but it’s not to believe that it’s something we have to fight against, it would do us good to have so much technology, so many Western possibilities, but without losing sight of the fact that the center is neither technocracy nor a concept, but it’s rather the ecosystem of itself which must be its and in that moment I think that for the traditional communities it would be rather good contribution the West the problem is not in the West brings but in what the West does not see I have a complementary semantic question the word I am bicultural sorry yes we have a little bit max I didn’t hear I let you finish your sentence and I think after I tried to come back to the sociological dimension so you ask me the questions to the max myself I am for example bicultural multicultural but I can explain it from my suede side, my French side, my father was French, I was bathed, I studied in France, I stayed 12 years in France and I am grateful for what France has given me and I feel a great love for it, but to share something with you and of the order of the heart, when I was, let’s say, in the aspiration, in the old mental marketing, to tell myself that you have to choose one or the other, and for a culture like mine, where I am told if you have to choose between being an Indian and being a Frenchman, to all of them, pushing me to want to choose that I am French, and they want you to believe that you have to be on the Western side because it’s validation of the individual and it’s the validation of the pinnacle of citizenship well there you enter into conflict and I don’t have you well in my heart to be frank by wanting to be French I was entering into conflict with my side in suede because the mental structure conveyed somewhere by our western energy and to make a choice and always compartmentalized remember we go to university to the only version things and if we are taught from a very young age to choose unique versions it’s complicated for people who have a multiple heart likeChamam who has a multi-heart, it’s complicated to have a one-way street, so how did I solve that was by not telling myself I’m French, trying to understand my side in the bath, but by telling myself I’m a mandate who feels the French seed in his heart, it was very simple, having an ecosystem heart is wiser and smarter to become a technician of the earth, a technician of the earth a semantic question, the word variety in French, what Thomas who comes said, which has a meaning, we which is very legalistic, what it is defined by very defined, homogeneous things, in Spanish, we will say valerian, questions how is the etymological root if there is one of the word that would be the equivalent Variety time, I’d be interested in leaving but it’ll confuse you, but I think we’d talk about family, and even if in Western taxonomy we also use the word family, but it refers to another taxonomic category, here we’d talk about family, you see the family of messages, it’s always an idea of relationship, you’re going to say, if you have to translate into Quechua, how many varieties of corn do you have? see this question what is the word that used for I asked we have already discussed with the wise men this theme I am unfortunately not a great technician of Quechua I understand it well but I’ll tell you what they told me, there are no words to say that, it’s a way of compartmentalized that doesn’t necessarily correspond to the heart of dwarf men, they’re going to talk about always a sense in relationships, you’re going to put it in a kind of category, they’re going to put it, the category is a box with a name for them, the fact that they’re together, it’s not because you put them in a box, it’s not what they have a link, so the term that I am that they would use would be family or community, as for humans, it would be a community, how many communities, so no, but I, because I think it’s a net without Thomas in the interviews, to go through the side of language that can say a lot about the relational mode that has totally totally because and it is important that you address which is in the terms because often on the Western side we tend to believe that we use the terms in the same sense and often the traditional populations add a dimension to them, as I tell you, affective to each concept, there is a dimension more affective than underestimated, this is the question you ask me, is there an equivalent that I am to, for example, refers you directly that there is no conceptualization of even conceptualization and this conceptualization is replaced by an affective vision and your lover as I tell you for example when I explain it to philosophy students or foreigners who come no-nose, I said at the beginning we are thinking subjects and we are going to think the stone that is thought of, the object it is inanimate, we exercise the action on the object, the seed somewhere we will put it in an object Animated, because it doesn’t move, it doesn’t have, it’s not animated by a muscle and a soul, so it’s an object that is thought, that’s passive in its relationship with you, whereas we don’t go to see, even if it’s the same situation and you have the same seed, what’s on the table, the traditional from the outset, he doesn’t see an object, he sees a subject, that changes all the pockets, it changes the whole approach, I think that on the other hand, all those who handle these seeds, well, who sows them, nurserymen, countries, farmers, etc., even as Western as they have, they have this approach, what is not an inanimate object, the seed, well, there is me, I see when, for example, we the first conference I attended, that Max did, he started with distributing a seed to each of the people and it is because in this seed there was something that was not of the order of the inanimate but that this seed was the bearer of a future and that it was not an object, so I think that all those who handle these objects, well, it’s this good thing, they are aware that of this, what it is, you’re talking about a microcosm that is ours, Sophie, but it’s exactly just in the world, we say, not only in the European legislative world, but we say the genetic material, nothing but the use From the word material presents it as something dynamic, each or every farmer can find in it a sensitivity and a link, we can have echoes of this relationship but I think that it is globally in the vast majority lost and it is the seed it is an input like any other for many an immense majority of growers absolutely fireworks that make genetics I think there is it necessary when not even forget this general shape not that it’s the majority and I think that there it is South is there that resembles in my opinion a lot because I would project on the conference of Saturday, October 5 on the online Cosmo vision and this relationship to the seed Alice we had would you like to see take advantage of the end of this shared moment to see with Alain a bit like organized on the organizational part enjoy being together to imagine how we’re going to do the Saturday conference with you I just have a micro incise to make beforehand to make the bridge well I find that Alain for those who are part of the group pep’s there you confirm us more an intuition that you don’t confuse us than that you put us in confusion that’s what I mean through that but just echoing in resonance is that what appears to us is that practices emerge within the Western paradigm and that are carried and that are close to those you talk about in the fields and that are carried by lovers and that’s what I want to make ring is and the loft cover and the check to